Leading Consciously logo
Chapter  
17

We Will Learn Today

By Charles Shaw

Chapter  
5

Learning to Test Negative Assumptions

by Eli Davis

Chapter  
8

Clearing Emotions Can Be a Daunting Task

by Carole Marmell

Chapter  
17

We Will Learn Today

By Charles Shaw

Chapter  
15

Act Out of Values Rather than Emotions

By Ashleigh Gardner-Cormier

Chapter  

I Need to Understand Where She's Coming From

By Ashley Ochoa

Chapter  
18

Testing! Testing! Digging Deeper into Initial Resistance to Change

By Erika Young

Chapter  
21

Goal: Create A Culturally Responsive Organization

By Sylvia R. Epps

Chapter  
19

Introducing New Ways of Thinking into a Risk-Averse Organization

By Melissa Simon

Chapter  
6

Dashed Hopes and Expectations

By Tracy Forman

Chapter  
13

How Do I Deal with a Hostile Work Environment?

By Orfelinda Coronado

Chapter  
16

Compassion Wins the Day

By Treshina Smith

Chapter  
20

Anticipate a Certain Amount of Resistance

By Mary H. Beck

Chapter  
7

Can Anyone Be a Social Worker? The Challenge of Correcting Misinformation

By Alicia Beatrice

Chapter  
9

What You See Depends on the Lens You Use

By Steven Hayes

Chapter  
4

Choosing a Career Can Be Emotional Work!

By Shanquela Williams (with Amy Foy Hageman)

Chapter  
5

Learning to Test Negative Assumptions

By Eli Davis

Chapter  
3

Hijacked!

By Emily Schwartz Kemper

I have come to expect difficult conversations to be tense, especially when discussing sensitive topics where one can only guess the outcome. I think of myself as both a skilled facilitator and expert in group interventions, but a meeting I had a few years ago challenged those assumptions. Given the circumstances, even I felt like a novice.

I was leading a team charged with rolling out an enterprise-wide and highly visible project, one touching thousands of people. It was my responsibility to define the vision, set direction, and assign work streams based on team members’ individual strengths.

Through no fault of any one person, we were severely under-resourced. Individuals on the team were performing two and three different jobs at a time. It was a lean team of six carrying tremendous responsibility for flawless execution—as if we were staffed with fifty. I was the leader of the team and the only African American. The other five members were White women.

Contents May Explode Under Pressure

Throughout the course of the project, I had noticed behaviors I found passive-aggressive, even toxic—ones I characterize as unsafe for people of color. I am being thoughtful about my word choice here. As a person of color, I find some frequently displayed behaviors, accepted as “normal” in majority groups, to be hostile. I am not alone in this. I hear similar statements from people of color all around the country.

Over the course of three months, the team had been meeting six to seven times a week. Every meeting felt like an emotional battle, laced with microaggressions. I found the many thinly veiled negative undertones distracting and counterproductive. Particularly grating were implied demands couched in phrases like, “I need you to . . .” There were many such subtle challenges to my leadership and authority.

On this particular day, the accumulation of stress seemed comparable to a label reading “Contents may explode under pressure.”

Three of us had just sat down when Helene (alias), one of the core project team members, said to me in a tone sharp enough to cut glass, “Charles, you said you were going to email Yvette and get her reaction to what we talked about yesterday. Did you?

“No,” I replied. “But we did meet in the conference room this morning and I asked her about it.”

“And who, if anyone, was going to tell me about it?” Helene’s hostile tone of voice implied I was intentionally withholding information from her.

“Well, we only chatted for a few minutes, and we said . . .” I launched into a summary of as much of the conversation as I could recall while thinking, If I provide enough details, I’m sure she’ll stop worrying about being left out of the loop.

Her furrowed brows told me this was not the case. Nevertheless, I proceeded to provide an update on another aspect of the project and asked for her and Penny’s thoughts. Penny (another pseudonym) was another member of the team who often partnered with Helene and mentored her.

“I’m not sure everyone is being kept as up to date as they should,” Helene said, arms crossed over her chest in a display of doubt. “We can’t ever succeed with this project if we don’t have the information we need.”

Good grief, how long is she going to beat that dead horse? I wondered to myself.

Penny, eager to smooth things over, jumped in, “Charles, a lot is being piled on Helene right now and I’m not sure she’s getting the support she needs.”

Each new statement in this steady stream of thinly veiled criticism of my leadership felt like daggers. If they had expressed concerns with an attitude of seeking to resolve them, I would have welcomed the feedback. This is not what they chose to do. Instead, they threw out statement after statement, implying I was derelict in not providing enough information and support: “Did you [email Yvette]?” “Who, if anyone, was going to tell me about it?” “I’m not sure everyone is being kept up to date as they should.” “We can’t ever succeed with this project if we don’t have the information we need.” “I’m not sure she’s getting the support she needs.”

By the time Penny joined the fray with the last statement, my blood was boiling, my heart beating fast, and my mind racing. I felt under threat. All the while, I noted the irony that I, a 6-foot, 190-pound African American man, could feel all that threatened by two small-framed White women. But there I was, because of the weight of what felt like their obvious bias disguised as reasonable observations.

Given my awareness of the constant and relentless attack on people of color in the United States, my first reaction was to respond as the Black Panther/cultural warrior, establishing boundaries, defending my family and my name, while also inflicting a blow to their egos for assuming I would tolerate their bullshit. In that moment, they were in the unfortunate position of representing hundreds of White women in my history who had not checked their own deeply embedded biases and instead were acting them out in their interactions with me.

I knew I needed to say or do something. Otherwise, I ran the risk of something being said for me and done without me. When I am experiencing intense anxiety, my ears begin to burn—my body telling me something isn’t quite right, an early warning system signaling psychological or physical threat. My ears were burning then. It was a moment of intense emotion, stress, and a strong feeling of being disrespected, yet I knew I needed to come to a decision quickly.

Authenticity and Tact Under Pressure

My mind swirled with an analysis of the position I was in. I was aware of the privilege of my position as a senior leader within the organization, my role as a coach and developer of people, and my standing as a member of a team whose members I respected. I was even quite fond of them on less stressful days. Although my body was on red alert, I still felt the need to teach, to tell the truth of what I was experiencing in this interaction.

I chose not to compromise my humanity as a Black man, and instead to be a truth-telling coach and leader. I did this by drawing on my innate principles, as well as those I had learned and refined through the years: clearing negative emotions and amplifying positive emotions quickly in service of others.

I took a deep breath and steadied myself, because I knew my anger, if not channeled, could be harmful.

“Why don’t we just stop right here and call a time out?” I suggested in a voice both strong and assertive. The expressions on my two colleagues’ faces told me my statement had startled them. If they didn’t know I had reached my limit, they were about to, because it was time for me to express the feelings I’d been carrying around in a bubble for weeks.

“I’ve worked really hard to keep both of you abreast of what’s happening, but the level of passive-aggressive behavior is making me uncomfortable,” I said, giving myself permission to call a spade a spade and thrilled with how freeing it felt. “Frankly, I feel it’s undeserved, and it’s not consistent with success.”

I saw a mixture of shock and fear in Helene’s eyes, and that pleased me. I wanted her to absorb the truth of my feedback. I had genuine concerns about the professional development of these two White women and their capacity to receive less-than-positive feedback. I felt the only way to achieve that was for me to amplify what I wanted them to hear.

I heard my inner voice saying, I am a Black man calling you out on your shit. You will learn today. I wasn’t looking to cause them angst, but I was determined that they “get” the impact of their actions. Despite my own internal churning, I was still opting to be a supportive leader.

“Helene, the work you’re doing is great, but your lack of flexibility and inability to quickly switch direction when asked causes more confusion than it needs to. I really need you to hear that. No one is keeping information from you. People work around you because you make it difficult with the way you react. And this meeting is a prime example of that.”

Helene gave me a stern look and exhaled audibly. I noticed Penny’s hand shaking. She seemed to be gearing up to speak, so I waited for her to gather her words.

After a few moments of profound tension, Penny said, “Charles, I hope I wasn’t coming across as passive-aggressive. That wasn’t my intention at all. It’s just that there have been so many changing directions on this project that it gets frustrating, and I think Helene feels the same way.” She cast an expectant look at Helene, who promptly backed her up.

They made a few more statements, obviously seeking to explain their behavior as rational and justified. The meeting ended on a low note. I felt an equal mix of frustration and justification about my position and suspected they felt the same.

Learning Is the Key

The next day, Helene approached me in the break room. “Can we talk about what happened at our meeting yesterday? I’m feeling really uncomfortable and misunderstood.”

“Sure,” I responded.

“As you know,” Helene began, “I’ve just recently returned from maternity leave. I also have a toddler at home, so I’m extremely sleep-deprived and under a great deal of stress. I know this causes me to be abrupt at times.”

She’d said as much yesterday. I resisted the temptation to roll my eyes and instead injected empathy into my voice. “Yes, I do know you’ve recently had a child, and I’m sure you’re tired. I can even see how that might affect your interactions with me. But I think it’s important for you to realize that you’re engaging with a Black man who’s had this same exact experience many times. If it only happened this one time, it wouldn’t be a thing. But it doesn’t only happen with you and Penny.

“It’s pretty common for White people to use more aggressive language and tone with me than the situation calls for,” I continued. “And since I don’t see that same behavior when they’re interacting with each other, I have to interpret it as them feeling they have a ‘right’ to treat me like I’m inferior to them.”

“Oh, I never think of you as inferior,” she quickly replied. “In fact, you’re one of the smartest and most articulate people I know ... although I admit I haven’t interacted with a lot of Black people.”

Lord, this woman needs help, I thought. I felt my jaws tighten but spoke calmly. “While I’m sure you didn’t mean to imply as much, can you see how the statement you just made suggests that being smart and articulate isn’t something you’d expect from a Black person? Those are the kinds of assumptions I live with every day. They’re called ‘microaggressions.’”

Helene’s facial expression was almost comical; she looked like the kid caught with their hand in the proverbial cookie jar. She’d been busted, and she knew there wasn’t a damned thing she could say. Her new baby, her two-year-old, her sleep deprivation, none of them were valid excuses. Maybe I should have felt sorry for her ... but I didn’t. I kept talking.

“Too often, I’ve seen White people position themselves as experts, and then turn around and do or say things that try to identify with me, as a signal that they understand my experience, that they’re ‘woke.’ But it just sounds shallow to me.”

“I didn’t mean to come off that way,” Helene said unconvincingly.

I ignored her. “If I don’t speak up,” I went on, “and allow White coworkers to talk to me in a manner I find unacceptable, I run the risk of diminishing myself to make them feel important. And for us to have a good working relationship, one where we feel we can trust each other, we need to be able to talk about issues like this.”

“Thank you, Charles,” Helene said. “I really appreciate your sharing this with me. I don’t have a lot of Black friends . . .”

My inner voice chimed in again, That much is clear.

“. . . and have no way of knowing when I’m saying or doing something offensive. And I really would like to know. Although I may seem resistant initially—probably just a knee-jerk reaction to being exposed—I really would appreciate the feedback. I want to be viewed as an ally and a really good colleague.”

She actually sounded sincere, I thought. So I said, “I think it helps to accept the fact that you’ll get it wrong with me sometimes . . . and that other times I’ll get it wrong with you. I don’t want you to feel like you have to walk on eggshells around me. I’d like us to develop a more trusting relationship where we can give each other feedback, check in with one another, to be able to say ‘Hey, here’s what you said, here’s how it landed with me. I’m wondering if that was your intent?’ Having an open line of communication rather than operating on assumptions and suspicions.”

Helene nodded agreement. She committed to improving her awareness and asked if I would support her in building her skills in that area. Naturally, I said I would. She also said she would enlist Penny as an accountability partner on the journey. The pivot was welcome and refreshing, a breakthrough we needed as peers.

This experience made a crucial contribution to my growth as a leader. The cumulative impact of these types of interactions can be both exhausting and emotionally triggering. It was invigorating to know I could summon options for navigating these terse exchanges. Both my colleagues and I gained important learnings from this exchange and subsequent interactions. And while I can still hear that inner voice repeating, “You will learn today,” years later it is saying, “We will learn today.”

By the time I left that organization, we were functioning really well as coworkers. And ultimately, the project was a success.

Uncomfortable Conversations Can Lead to Comfortable Outcomes
(Reflections on Charles’s Story)

At first glance, Charles’s story seems to be about the principle for Bridging Differences, but it’s about much more than that. The story also does a masterful job of showing the interconnectedness of the principles for Clearing Emotions and Conscious Use of Self, both key components in addressing the racial “elephant in the room.”

Charles was acutely aware of the dominant/nondominant dynamics of unequal power and status playing out in his interactions with the other team members. As most of us do, he had a mix of roles. As team leader and a tall male, he was a member of dominant groups, but as the only Black in a group of White women, he was fully cognizant of their possible obliviousness to how he, as a nondominant group member, was experiencing their behavior toward him. Intended or not, some requests made of him felt like challenges to his leadership and authority.

In the first interaction, his emotions were clearly triggered. As a Black man in a leadership position for some time, he was familiar with having his emotions set off by others. He knew the danger of suppressed emotions.

Given his values and history, he was also practiced in acknowledging and processing his emotions, and thus knew how to clear his strong and negative emotions in the moment: “I took a deep breath, steadied myself.” This was a practice he had cultivated. He explicitly stated how, over the years, he had learned to quickly clear his negative emotions and amplify his positive emotions.

Charles consciously chose to make the interaction with Helene and Penny a “teaching moment.” He was aware of his power in the situation and decided to use it in a way that would strengthen the team. In doing so, he acknowledged that his strong emotional reaction to Helene’s (and others’) responses to him were not just about the specific situation but also a result of an accumulation of such interactions with White women overtime. He didn’t want to generalize the stereotype to all White women, yet he knew many White women and other dominant group members were often totally unaware of the effect their words and tone had on nondominant group members.

His desire to “speak his truth” demonstrated his integrity in openly dealing with what in many organizations would be undiscussable issues. As uncomfortable as it might be, he felt it his job—his responsibility, really—to teach them increased awareness. He chose to deliberately operate from an assumption that they could, and would, learn.

It was also apparent that he made a choice to call Helene and Penny into community with him rather than calling them out. He was “irreversibly committed to the outcome of their improvement,” not wanting to harm them or cause them angst. He knew the dominance dynamics were interfering with the development of trust among team members and keeping them from doing their best work. When Charles referred to “frequently displayed behaviors,accepted as ‘normal’ in majority groups,” he was describing systemic racism rather than individual racism, involving normalization and justification of dynamics routinely advantaging Whites while producing adverse outcomes for people of color. He made a point to note their tone and aggression toward him as different from how they treated one another. His discussion with Helene and Penny seemed focused on the intended or unintended attitudes and behaviors of the two White women atthe individual level, but it was really motivated by his experience of systemic racism. He’d had years of experiences with taken-for-granted organizational practices derogating him and others.

When he inwardly declared “you will learn today,” and reflected on the two women’s seeming unawareness of the impact of their actions, this historical context was an important part of what he wanted them to learn: that their actions would not just be interpreted in the here and now. Rather, whether they liked it or not, their words and actions would be received by people of color within the backdrop of their historical experience.

He seemed to grasp the level of stress Helene was experiencing, but also knew allowing White coworkers to talk to him in unacceptable tones would run the risk of diminishing himself “to make them feel seen, heard and respected.” He resisted the slippery slope to internalized oppression. The result Charles sought was an improved working relationship among team members. He wanted the team to create an environment where open inquiry into and transparency about dominant/nondominant dynamics existed and candid feedback was the norm. Because of his diligence and willingness to risk discomfort, by the end of his tenure with the organization, he had come much closer to achieving this goal.

Conscious Change Principles and Skills
in This Chapter

  • Clear Emotions
    • Identify with your values, not your emotions
    • Avoid emotional suppression
    • Clear your negative emotions
    • Build your positive emotions
  • Build Effective Relationships
    • Develop skills in inquiry and openness
    • Learn how to give, receive, and seek feedback
    • Distinguish intent from impact
  • Bridge Differences
    • Address underlying systemic biases
    • Learn to recognize dominant/nondominant dynamics
    • Check for stereotyping tendencies, unconscious bias, and lack of awareness in your behavior, especially as a dominant group member
    • As a nondominant, resist any tendency toward internalized oppression or viewing dominants as beyond your ability to influence
    • As a nondominant, recognize dominants’ potential unawareness about the impact of their behavior
    • Call others in rather than calling them out
  • Conscious Use of Self
    • Accept responsibility for your own contributions
    • Maintain integrity
    • Seek to understand others’ perspectives
    • Adopt a growth mindset
    • Recognize your power and use it responsibly
  • Initiate Change
    • Surface undiscussables

About Charles

Charles D. Shaw is the Head of Scaled Learning for Meta Platforms. He has held prior leadership roles with Amazon, Yum! Brands (KFC, Taco Bell, Pizza Hut), Walmart, and Spectra Energy. He specializes in advancing organizational culture, performance management, leadership and organizational development, and diversity, equity, and inclusion. Charles brings real-world application to his work. Charles began his career as a voice-over intern for learning and development initiatives at a science, technology, and engineering firm in Houston, Texas. He has also worked in a nonprofit supporting mental health and wellness professions. He obtained his PhD in organizational psychology from the California School of Professional Psychology in San Francisco. A lover of music, art, travel, tennis, and food, Charles currently resides in Oakland, CA. He is a native of Houston, Texas.

Charles became acquainted with Jean Latting while she was working with Spectra Energy’s HR team and had an initial introduction to Conscious Use of Self.