Leading Consciously logo
Chapter  
6

Dashed Hopes and Expectations

By Tracy Forman

Chapter  
5

Learning to Test Negative Assumptions

by Eli Davis

Chapter  
8

Clearing Emotions Can Be a Daunting Task

by Carole Marmell

Chapter  
17

We Will Learn Today

By Charles Shaw

Chapter  
15

Act Out of Values Rather than Emotions

By Ashleigh Gardner-Cormier

Chapter  

I Need to Understand Where She's Coming From

By Ashley Ochoa

Chapter  
18

Testing! Testing! Digging Deeper into Initial Resistance to Change

By Erika Young

Chapter  
21

Goal: Create A Culturally Responsive Organization

By Sylvia R. Epps

Chapter  
19

Introducing New Ways of Thinking into a Risk-Averse Organization

By Melissa Simon

Chapter  
6

Dashed Hopes and Expectations

By Tracy Forman

Chapter  
13

How Do I Deal with a Hostile Work Environment?

By Orfelinda Coronado

Chapter  
16

Compassion Wins the Day

By Treshina Smith

Chapter  
20

Anticipate a Certain Amount of Resistance

By Mary H. Beck

Chapter  
7

Can Anyone Be a Social Worker? The Challenge of Correcting Misinformation

By Alicia Beatrice

Chapter  
9

What You See Depends on the Lens You Use

By Steven Hayes

Chapter  
4

Choosing a Career Can Be Emotional Work!

By Shanquela Williams (with Amy Foy Hageman)

Chapter  
5

Learning to Test Negative Assumptions

By Eli Davis

Chapter  
3

Hijacked!

By Emily Schwartz Kemper

Two months after receiving my Master of Social Work, I was offered an employment opportunity with a rapidly growing inpatient behavioral health facility. One of the facility leaders, Ms. Anderson (a pseudonym), with whom I had worked in another professional setting, extended the invitation.

“I am familiar with your work ethic and style and believe you would align and assist with my ultimate goal of building a great team,” she said. “You will be fourth Social Worker to join the team if you accept my offer.”

“Thank you so much,” I replied. “Could I have a few days to consider this offer?”

“Of course.”

I spent the next few days weighing competing opportunities, as well as my financial obligations, and decided to accept the offer.

All That Glitters . . .

The salary was appealing, and I liked the mission and vision of the facility. Moreover, the company’s leadership seemed committed to creating a flagship behavioral health facility, one that could serve as a state-wide model. Being an integral part of this team seemed to present a unique and perfectly tailored opportunity for me to help turn this vision into a reality. For a new LMSW, the experience seemed to provide an opportunity to become more knowledgeable in the field of Behavioral Health and make significant differences in the lives of those I served.

Ms. Anderson, also fairly new to the organization, was upbeat as she gave me an initial tour of the facility.

She did admit, “The décor of the facility is a bit unsavory and drab, but I’m optimistic about the future. It’s on its way up!”

This reaffirmed my excitement. “I’m pleased to be part of this effort.”

I felt we were on the same page, working toward the same goals and committed to making a difference. After completing the necessary paperwork and prescreening activities, taking the required trainings, and attending a full day of orientation, I was still enthusiastic. I couldn’t wait to begin.

A week later, during my first day of work, I was abruptly reminded that everything that glitters is not gold. I learned there would be only three Social Workers instead of four as I had thought. The individual with whom I was to have shared the unit and caseload had been suddenly dismissed. My caseload would now be between twenty-two and twenty-seven patients. This number of patients might have been normal for a Social Worker in Child Protective Services but represented a daunting task in Behavioral Health. My responsibilities included completing psycho-social assessments and coordinating discharge plans for each of these patients, as well as facilitating groups and attending Treatment Team meetings. The patients’ stays averaged one to three days, creating narrow timeframes for such a high volume of casework.

I also quickly learned there was no shortage of organizational problems. Specifically, the culture of the organization seemed toxic. In addition to general disarray at all levels of the organization, there were problems with nepotism, ineffective communication, patient complaints, HIPAA violations, premature employee terminations, and employee resignations. My initial vision of the facility becoming a flagship was beginning to fade.

Taking Responsibility to Initiate Change

I thought long and hard about what I could do to facilitate cohesion within the facility without appearing pretentious or being perceived as a troublemaker. I began to journal my thoughts, clearing any type of emotional connection I had to the issues at hand. Strong emotional reactions to my discoveries were easy, even reasonable. I was disappointed, angry, and exhausted from the workload. However, I had grown to understand that negativity doesn’t solve anything. I needed to recognize and acknowledge my legitimate emotions but take steps to intervene at a higher cognitive level. I also believed that to be an effective leader and communicator, to help bring about change, I had to get others to buy in. I could not accomplish this by spreading negative energy.

As part of my journaling process, I listed each discipline within the facility, and to the best of my knowledge, their tasks. At the center of all these tasks were the patients. This made me think of a puzzle. I made a crude drawing of a jigsaw puzzle, showing patients as the center puzzle piece, with the various disciplines surrounding it. Next, rather than focusing on deficiencies or opportunities for improvements, I outlined the strengths I observed in each department and how those benefited patient care. After pulling all my thoughts together, I arranged a meeting to share them with Ms. Anderson.

There was excitement in my voice as I explained, “My logic is simple: if everyone, in every department, were valued as an essential piece of the puzzle then patient care would inevitably be great. Excellent patient care would lead to enacting our larger, collective vision of flagship status.”

To my surprise, after asking a few questions, Ms. Anderson seemed to be on board, saying, “Hmmm. This makes sense. Would you put together a formal and detailed writeup and send it to me via email?”

“I would be glad to!” I replied. And eagerly did so.

A few days later, she sent me her version of what I had provided. Instead of using my original and deliberately themed title of You’re an Essential Piece of the Puzzle, she entitled her writeup, Piecing it Together.

I felt insulted and angry at how she seemed to have distorted my message. My title was intentionally focused on conveying a belief that if everyone felt essential, the company stood to get the best from each employee. Her title deflected that focus. I felt misunderstood. To me, the notion of piecing something together had ragged, negative undertones.

So back to my journal I went. This time around, not only did I need to clear more negative emotions, I needed to question my assumption that Ms. Anderson was out to drive me crazy with that awful title. So I generated other hypotheses for why she reframed my original message. I knew she was in no way malicious and would never have done anything intentionally to upset the situation. After all, her goal was also to assist this facility in becoming a flagship.

I wrote: “Maybe changing the title from You’re an Essential Piece of the Puzzle to Piecing it Together was just a matter of semantics for Ms. Anderson.

“Maybe Ms. Anderson imagined the beauty of how quilts are pieced together. Thus, she used Piecing it Together metaphorically to describe the potential beauty of cohesiveness among the disciplines within the facility.

“Maybe Ms. Anderson used the word piecing in its most literal sense, meaning to assemble something from individual parts. In this regard, the word piecing could be thought of as each discipline coming together, to strengthen the mission and vision of the facility.”

As I wrote and pondered alternative explanations for her actions, I intentionally treated each as a serious possibility, thus making my original assumption more tentative. It was important to focus on what I knew, not what I might be making up about the situation.

After I wrote until I was on the verge of carpal tunnel, I concluded that I could not afford to allow my emotions or subsequent feelings and thoughts to overly influence me. As Dr. Latting’s work had taught me, I had to interrupt or intervene in old habits of processing thoughts and emotions. Only then could I effectively help the company fulfill its goal of rendering the best possible care to patients.

After reconciling my thoughts, clearing my emotions, and testing my assumptions, I was able to discuss the issue further with Ms. Anderson. My goal was to birth a mutual understanding and reignite commitment to the vision.

Fortunately, we were able to get to a point of common understanding. Unfortunately, the campaign never came to fruition—the operative goal of the hospital shifted to simply keeping the beds filled.

Capturing the Learning Despite Disappointment

The company continues to be successful, but the important puzzle pieces of the employees and patients have been forgotten, as was the mission that inspired me.

Nevertheless, by learning to clear my emotions, I also learned to choose my battles and focus my energy where I can exert the most positive influence. In doing so, I stress less and am more present for myself, my family, and my patients. I no longer hold onto negative thoughts or feelings because I now understand they are like visitors who come and go.

Emotions as Visitors That Come and Go
(Reflections on Tracy’s Story)

Being able to identify negative emotions is an important first step in learning to regulate them. When Tracy discovered things were not as they first seemed within the behavioral health facility, she identified her feelings as “disappointed, angry.” Similarly, when she saw the altered version of her proposal to her supervisor, she felt misunderstood—“insulted and angry” at what she perceived as a distortion of her original meaning. In both cases, she recognized the importance of clearing these negative emotions if she wished to be effective in negotiating change. Although she could have used other methods to do the emotional clearing, Tracy chose journaling.

Tracy’s ability to clear her emotions around her early disappointment and anger helped broaden her perspective and led to her coming up with a proposal for centering patient care as a pathway to achieving the vision of flagship status. If instead she had simply walked around feeling mad and betrayed, she would not have had the cognitive bandwidth to take this broader view.

To deal with the second round of negative emotions, Tracy used a version of uncensored journaling: “I wrote until I was on the verge of carpal tunnel.” Uncensored journaling works best when writing continues until you experience an “a-ha” moment or feel a sense of relief from the negative emotion. It’s not clear whether she continued to write until she hit a release point—it’s easy to short-circuit the process. But the journaling did seem to help her move past her initial negative emotions and allowed her to have what she described as a productive discussion with Ms. Anderson. Her ability to view her emotions as “visitors that come and go” bodes well for her ability to avoid being emotionally hijacked in the future.

As part of her journaling process, Tracy interrogated her initial beliefs about why Ms. Anderson reformulated her concept of You’re an Essential Piece of the Puzzle to Piecing it Together. In her words, she reconsidered her assumption that “Ms. Anderson was out to drive me crazy with that awful title.” She looked at several alternative explanations for her supervisor’s action. In so doing, she moved out of the answer into the question, intentionally tested her negative assumptions, and focused on Ms. Anderson’s strengths.

She was also able to begin to see that legitimate differences might be attached to the meaning of words and phrases. Treating each of her alternative hypotheses as a serious possibility helped make her original assumption more tentative. This cognitive reframing, in turn, helped her clear her emotions. Tracy recognized the importance of others “buying in” for effective change to occur. Aware that negative energy might hamper the change process, she was intentionally mindful of her emotions and attitudes. She was using herself consciously by recognizing her power and using it responsibly. She knew the ways in which she showed up would impact her ability to enrollothers in change.

Conscious Change Principles

and Skills in This Chapter

  • Test Negative Assumptions
    • Move from the answer into the question
    • Look for multiple points of view
    • Consciously test your negative assumptions
  • Clear Emotions
    • Avoid emotional suppression
    • Clear your negative emotions
  • Conscious Use of Self
    • Focus on others’ strengths
    • Recognize your power and use it responsibly
  • Initiate Change
    • Gain support for the change one person (or small group) at a time

About Tracy

Tracy Forman, LCSW, received a Master of Social Work from the University of Houston’s Graduate College of Social Work (GCSW). For over fifteen years, she has worked in the field of Social Services and Behavioral Health, subsequently finding her passion working in Forensics and Inpatient Behavioral Health, as well as in her private practice. Tracy enjoys spending time traveling with her family and shopping.

Her introduction to Conscious Change came by way of Dr. Latting’s leadership, administration, and advocacy course, at the University of Houston’s GCSW. Upon learning these skills, Tracy began to put them into practice by making a commitment to test assumptions in both her professional and private lives.